<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/health/policy/18cdc.html?_r=3D1>
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/health/policy/18cdc.html?_r=3D1
Advisers on Vaccines Often Have Conflicts, Report Says
By GARDINER HARRIS<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/peop=
le/h/gardiner_harris/index.html?inline=3Dnyt-per>
Published: December 17, 2009
WASHINGTON =97 A new report finds that the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organization=
s/c/centers_for_disease_control_and_prevention/index.html?inline=3Dnyt-org>=
did
a poor job of screening medical experts for financial conflicts when
it
hired them to advise the agency on vaccine safety, officials said Thursday.
Skip to next paragraph<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/health/policy/18c=
dc.html?_r=3D1#secondParagraph>
Related [image: Documents] Document: CDC's Ethics Program for Special
Government Employees on Federal Advisory
Committees<http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/health/18cdc.pdf>(pdf)
Most of the experts who served on advisory panels in 2007 to evaluate
vaccines for flu<http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/the-flu/ov=
erview.html?inline=3Dnyt-classifier>and
cervical
cancer<http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/cervical-cancer/over=
view.html?inline=3Dnyt-classifier>had
potential conflicts that were never resolved, the report said. Some
were
legally barred from considering the issues but did so anyway.
In the report, expected to be released Friday, Daniel R. Levinson, the
inspector general of the Department of Health and Human
Services<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/=
h/health_and_human_services_department/index.html?inline=3Dnyt-org>,
found that the centers failed nearly every time to ensure that the experts
adequately filled out forms confirming they were not being paid by companie=
s
with an interest in their decisions.
The report found that 64 percent of the advisers had potential conflicts of
interest that were never identified or were left unresolved by the centers.
Thirteen percent failed to have an appropriate conflicts form on file at th=
e
agency at all, which should have barred their participation in the meetings
entirely, Mr. Levinson found. And 3 percent voted on matters that ethics
officers had already barred them from considering.
The inspector general recommended that the centers do a far better job of
screening. In a reply, the agency=92s new director, Dr. Thomas R.
Frieden<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/f/thomas=
_r_frieden/index.html?inline=3Dnyt-per>,
agreed.
=93Since the period covered in this review, C.D.C. has strengthened the
financial disclosures and conflict-of-interest process by instituting
improved business processes and realigning responsibilities and oversight,=
=94
Dr. Frieden wrote.
As numerous medicines have been pulled from the market in recent years,
worries have grown that experts may be recommending medical products =97 ev=
en
ones they know to be unsafe =97 in part because manufacturers are paying th=
em.
As a result, government agencies, medical societies and medical journals
have become increasingly insistent that experts disclose potential
conflicts. And while the experts invariably insist that they have done so,
government audits routinely find large gaps between these disclosures and
the experts=92 actual income from consulting.
Congress tightened the rules on outside consulting after similar conflicts
were found among members of advisory panels to the Food and Drug
Administration<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organiza=
tions/f/food_and_drug_administration/index.html?inline=3Dnyt-org>.
But little attention has been paid to the potential conflicts of advisers t=
o
the C.D.C., even though that agency=92s committees have significant influen=
ce
over what vaccines are sold in the United States, what tests are performed
to detect cancer<http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/cancer/ove=
rview.html?inline=3Dnyt-classifier>and
how
coal<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/coal/in=
dex.html?inline=3Dnyt-classifier>miners
are protected.
Most of the advisers identified by Mr. Levinson had either a job or a grant
from a company or other entity whose interests were affected by the
committees=92 discussions, and a considerable number also owned stock in su=
ch
companies, the report said.
Representative Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat who said she had long
been a supporter of the C.D.C., said: =93That is why I am so concerned abou=
t
this report issued by the inspector general exposing serious ethics
violations within the C.D.C. All members of the federal advisory committees=
,
whose recommendations direct federal policy, should be without conflict of
interest.=94
---------------------------------------------
Send posts to CO-CURE@listserv.nodak.edu
Unsubscribe at http://www.co-cure.org/unsub.htm
Select list topic options at http://www.co-cure.org/topics.htm
---------------------------------------------
Co-Cure's purpose is to provide information from across the spectrum of
opinion concerning medical, research and political aspects of ME/CFS and/or
FMS. We take no position on the validity of any specific scientific or
political opinion expressed in Co-Cure posts, and we urge readers to
research the various opinions available before assuming any one
interpretation is definitive. The Co-Cure website <www.co-cure.org> has a
link to our complete archive of posts as well as articles of central
importance to the issues of our community.
---------------------------------------------
