Monday, November 14, 2011

NOT: Lawsuit Filed Against Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Researcher by Former Employer

http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/11/lawsuit-filed-against-chronic-fatigue.html

Lawsuit Filed Against Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Researcher by Former Employer
by Jon Cohen on 14 November 2011, 5:46 PM


The protracted saga of Judy Mikovits, the lead researcher who tied a
mouse retrovirus to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), has taken yet
another dizzying turn.

A little more than 1 month after firing Mikovits, the Whittemore
Peterson Institute for Neuro-Immune Disease (WPI) on 4 November filed
suit against its former research director. According to WPI, after
Mikovits was terminated on 29 September, she wrongfully removed
laboratory notebooks and kept other proprietary information on her
laptop and in flash drives and in a personal e-mail account. WPI, a
nonprofit organization that's based on the campus of the University of
Nevada, Reno, also won a temporary restraining order that forbids
Mikovits from "destroying, deleting, or altering" any of the related
files or data.

Mikovits attorney, Lois Hart, said her client cannot speak to the
media about the case, but she strongly denies any wrongdoing. In an
e-mail to ScienceInsider, Hart stressed that "Dr. Mikovits' integrity
goes to the bone."

Hart rebutted the charges against her client in a 4 November letter to
WPI's counsel that appeared on CFS-related Web sites. (Hart said she
did not release the letter, but verified its contents to
ScienceInsider.) "All of the allegations of theft, misappropriations,
withholding of data and various intellectual property, and items, are
incorrect, and untruthful," Hart wrote.

The complaint filed by WPI focuses on the laboratory notebooks kept by
Mikovits and her assistants, which she stored in a locked desk drawer.
WPI had a representative from the company that manufactured the desk
open the drawer after her firing and, the complaint states, then
discovered that "the Notebooks were missing." The suit, which alleges
breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets, claims that
"Mikovits had the only key to the locked desk drawer in her office."

Hart's rebuttal letter to WPI's counsel contends that Mikovits was not
in her office when she received the phone call that told her she was
terminated and that she never returned to the institute. "A number of
individuals have keys to the office and lab, including the
administrative staff, lab staff and custodial," Hart wrote. "Your
client's concern as to the location of those notebooks, and
intellectual property, should be directed elsewhere."

Mikovits worked for WPI since its inception in 2007. Established by
Annette and Harvey Whittemore, whose daughter has CFS, the institute
also studies fibromyalgia, post Lyme disease, and Gulf War illness.
The data Mikovits "absconded with," alleged WPI in court documents,
could harm the institute's future efforts. "Without these materials,
WPI's ability to continue its important research on finding a cure for
these terrible diseases impacting over 4 million Americans each year
is severely hampered," the complaint states. It contends that a
Proprietary Information and Invention Agreement that Mikovits signed
states that WPI owned the notebooks that she and others in the lab
created.

Robert Charrow, an attorney at Greenberg Traurig in Washington, D.C.,
who specializes in cases involving scientific research, says academia
and industry have different standards about researchers retaining
their own notebooks and data. Although Charrow stresses that he is not
familiar with the specifics of this case, he says industry typically
forbids researchers from taking data with them. "In academic
institutions, researchers are requested or required to give a copy of
their material or their data to the institution, and they can retain a
copy for themselves," says Charrow. "That's how it's usually done and
that's why there aren't more pissing matches."

Mikovits and her co-workers made international headlines following
Science's online publication on 8 October 2009 of an article in which
they reported that they had found a recently discovered mouse
retrovirus dubbed XMRV in the blood of 67% of the CFS patients they
examined. Several subsequent studies, including one that WPI
participated in, could not replicate the finding. A separate study,
also published in Science, provided evidence that XMRV was
accidentally created in a laboratory experiment with mice and
questioned whether it even infected humans. Science's Editor-in-Chief
Bruce Alberts issued an Editorial Expression of Concern about the
paper's veracity on 31 May. Science later published a partial
retraction to the Mikovits's group original paper after one of the
labs that contributed to it said a contaminant marred its results.

Nevada's Second Judicial District Court will hear a preliminary
injunction against Mikovits on 22 November.

---------------------------------------------
Send posts to CO-CURE@listserv.nodak.edu
Unsubscribe at http://www.co-cure.org/unsub.htm
---------------------------------------------
Co-Cure's purpose is to provide information from across the spectrum of
opinion concerning medical, research and political aspects of ME/CFS and/or
FMS. We take no position on the validity of any specific scientific or
political opinion expressed in Co-Cure posts, and we urge readers to
research the various opinions available before assuming any one
interpretation is definitive. The Co-Cure website <www.co-cure.org> has a
link to our complete archive of posts as well as articles of central
importance to the issues of our community.
---------------------------------------------